Unlock The Waiting Lists

Why the Money Follows the Person program matters for Georgia

Across the United States, a quiet shift has reshaped how people with disabilities and older adults receive long-term care. The Money Follows the Person (MFP) program, a federal Medicaid demonstration launched in 2007, was designed to let funding travel with the person rather than stay locked inside an institution. In Georgia, that idea has transformed thousands of lives, and its unfinished business sits at the centre of a growing waitlist crisis families and advocates refuse to ignore.

For readers in Australia, the parallels are hard to miss. The National Disability Insurance Scheme has, for more than a decade, pushed choice and control into the hands of participants, often over a flat white in a Melbourne café or at a kitchen table in Brisbane. Watching how a US state like Georgia negotiates the same tensions between institutional and community care offers useful context for anyone keen to understand how disability policy works once the brochures are put away.

What the Money Follows the Person program actually does

At its core, MFP recognises that the person, not the building, is the point. Eligible individuals who have lived in a qualified institutional setting for at least 60 days can receive tailored supports to transition into a home or community-based setting. Once they move, Medicaid dollars that would have paid for institutional care instead fund community services, personal assistance, and home modifications.

The program is voluntary for states, and each state designs its own version within federal rules. Participants get help with housing searches, transportation, peer mentoring, and short-term rental assistance during the transition window. MFP does not replace a state's Home and Community-Based Services (HCBS) waivers; it complements them, acting as a bridge while the broader waiver system continues to support participants once they are home.

How Georgia has put the program to work

Georgia adopted MFP in 2008 to support people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, physical disabilities, mental health conditions, and older adults needing long-term supports. The state prioritises transitions from nursing facilities, intermediate care facilities, and psychiatric hospitals, helping residents rebuild routines in their own homes or in small supported living settings.

A transition team works with the participant, family, and local providers to draft a person-centred plan, identify suitable housing, and ensure continuity of clinical care. Many of the same agencies that manage Georgia's HCBS waivers also administer MFP referrals, so the program often functions as the front door to a broader array of community supports. The framework echoes the way plan managers help NDIS participants in Adelaide or Perth navigate their packages.

The real difference for participants and families

The statistics tell part of the story: lower per-person Medicaid spending after transition, fewer hospital readmissions, and higher rates of community living. The human story is louder. A young man who spent years in a regional nursing home can move back to his parents' farm and catch the local bus to work. A grandmother with dementia can leave an institution and spend her afternoons in a familiar garden with her grandchildren. These are the everyday wins disability advocates point to when policy debates get stuck in budget spreadsheets.

Family caregivers also describe a shift. The relief of knowing their loved one is settled, safe, and in control of their day often replaces years of guilt and long drives to visit. Carers who have been through the process often become the strongest voices in the campaign to expand MFP, because they have seen what happens when funding is allowed to follow the person.

The waitlist reality in Georgia

The challenge is scale. Tens of thousands of Georgians sit on waiting lists for HCBS waivers, and MFP, while essential, can only move as many people as its annual capacity allows. Once a participant's 365 days of transition funding end, ongoing services must come from a separate waiver slot, and those slots are limited. The result is a pipeline that sometimes looks healthy at the front door and narrow at the back.

Advocates, including the coalition behind read the stories from families across the state, keep pushing for higher waiver caps, more transition coordinators, and stronger housing partnerships. Without those changes, MFP's promise risks being limited to a fortunate few rather than the tens of thousands who could benefit.

Lessons Australia's own path offers

Australia's experience with consumer-directed funding holds a mirror up to the Georgia debate. The NDIS was, in part, an answer to the same question American states have wrestled with for decades: how do you trust participants to direct their own supports without leaving them stranded? Early rollout in the Hunter region and Western Sydney exposed gaps in provider markets, thin rural services, and the need for stronger local networks, problems fair dinkum familiar to anyone who has watched scheme design up close.

For Georgia, the takeaway is mixed. Choice and control do not work without a robust provider market, accessible housing, and culturally responsive support, especially in rural counties where options can be thin. The MFP framework gets the principle right; filling in the operational gaps is where the hard work sits. Australian readers who have watched the NDIS mature will recognise that building genuine community care is less a single reform and more a long, often unglamorous project of patching, adjusting, and listening.

Why this story matters beyond Georgia

Disability policy is increasingly a conversation that crosses borders. Coalitions, researchers, and family advocates in Australia, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada trade notes on what works, what fails, and how to make community living the default rather than the exception. Georgia's experience with MFP is one of the more instructive case studies because it shows both the transformative potential of person-centred funding and the political stubbornness required to scale it.

Funders and nonprofits can also look at how local business networks help. A useful read on local fundraising partnerships between nonprofits and chambers of commerce shows how advocacy organisations can build financial resilience. Sustained change in disability services depends on broad coalitions, not just sympathetic lawmakers.

Practical steps for supporters and advocates

Whether you are a family member, a professional, or simply someone who believes community care should be the rule, there are concrete ways to back this work.

The next step is straightforward: pick one of those actions, set a date on the calendar this arvo, and follow through, because every transition out of an institution begins with someone deciding the current wait is too long and choosing to do something about it.